On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04 PM, siddiq@xxxxxxx <siddiq@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
>> I actually like this approach. It is surprisingly conservative, but
>> it offers a quality improvement potentially with every important
>> feature of the E-3 that I care about -- or so I hope (and it remains
>> to be seen). Would be nice if some of that "tuning" could be sent
>> backwards in the form of a firmware update.
>
> That’s what I’d like too, but very unlikely :(
I have to wonder whether they should have used a word like "tuning."
Suggests it's like overclocking a processor. I wouldn't think there
is any sort of wiggle room for actual "tuning." I suspect that comes
from the marketing dept.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|