Interesting; thanks, Chuck.
Chris
On 8 Sep 2010, at 23:15, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> Anyhow, the point of this intro is to lead into his comment here:
>
> "I'm sure that a properly exposed sheet of 4x5 film exceeds a 5D file in
> absolute photographic quality. However, those digital files print
> exceedingly well at high magnifications, well enough to satisfy just
> about any client - whether they're an architect or a magazine.
> Personally, I quit worrying about enlarging digital files when I found
> that a file from my original 6-megapixel 10D would make a 16x20 print
> indistinguishable from one made with a fine-grain negative shot with my
> Pentax 6x7."
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|