The answer is simple. You don't have a chance. If there is no arcane
rule of photography that you've broken we'll make one up. So there. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Ken Norton wrote:
> I rehashed about the E-1 a couple of days ago. Well, Today, I'm going
> to rerehash about the 14-50 lens. Sunday evening I went for a walk
> with the L1 with 14-50. Did a minimum focus picture at 50mm, wide-open
> (F3.5) and F4.0. For artistic intent, and the fact it was far past
> sunset I shot the picture at ISO 1600. Noisy? Sure.
>
> Here's the rub. I want to show off a tiny 800x600 portion of the
> picture at 1:1 pixels. But the noise pattern is, of course, a little
> ugly, more or less. At what point do I give up trying to illustrate
> one good thing in the presence of a bad thing that will be taken out
> of context and people will end up trash-talking the image because of
> it?
>
> Or worse, criticizing my methods of picture taking because it doesn't
> conform to some arcane rules of photography?
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|