I think it reflects pseudo-science, or bullshit in common parlance...
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
YNWA
On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Not exactly a dissertation but I did consider it highly unusual that
> Panasonic micro 4/3 and Leica P&S cameras made the top of the list for
> the photo attractiveness score... blowing away all the DSLRs. These
> cameras can't be very numerous yet. Also peculiar is that cameras with
> greater depth of field and non-P&S cameras fare generally worse than
> other camera types. That would imply that micro 4/3 and the Leica P&S
> should be at a disadvantage to the DSLRs... but they weren't.
>
> Does this somehow reflect the demographic of those who took the photos?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Joel Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I want an iPhone.
>>
>> You'll need it since your Olympus equipment apparently makes you
>> repulsive. Oh wait, you're PanaLeica now. You're gorgeous, dood!
>>
>> But I'm waiting for Chuck's dissertation on the credibility of the
>> research first.
>>
>> Joel W.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|