I'm still surprised at the apparent depth of field.
Chuck Norcutt
Jim Nichols wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> It is cropped. I would guess that the portion of the flower shown here is
> three to four inches from front to back. For close-up work, I use f/10 or
> there abouts with this 35mm lens.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 6:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Details
>
>
>> An intriguing shot to be sure but also with intriguing apparent depth of
>> field. What's the approximate linear size from front to back here?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Jim Nichols wrote:
>>> This flower is nice from a distance, but the intricate details are
>>> intriguing.
>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Details.jpg.html
>>>
>>> Comments and critiques always welcomed.
>>>
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
