Re: [OM] Whatever it is, it is

[Chuck Norcutt]

Seems to me that the quality of the photograph (which is very good) has 
more to do with the photographer's choice of excellent light followed by 
positioning of said Mona Lisa within the light.  But, no, I didn't see 
any PanaLeica mystique.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Ken Norton wrote:
> I put a sample photo in the L1 review on www.zone-10.com that somehow
> in some silly way seems to illustrate what I'm talking about. I know
> it's tough in a one-off picture to make sense of anything, but for
> those who recognize the look, I think this photograph shows it.
> 
> Again, whatever "it" is.
> 
> http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=517&Itemid=1
> 
> Oh, my....
> 
> I was just looking at that photo again and notied two things. First of
> all, she's not hearing a word I'm saying because of the iPod blaring
> away in her ears, but she's got this "Mona Lisa" thing going on where
> the expression changes depending on where you look at her face. This
> was at one of her track meets where she was happy I was there, but
> wished that I could disappear.
> 
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/