Subject: | Re: [OM] Film ain't dead, yet |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:26:30 -0500 |
I considered it snippy. :). Guess I need to try harder. AG On Thursday, July 1, 2010, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just for the record I didn't consider it snippy. I didn't like the > grain but knew perfectly well you (and others) would defend it. To each > his own. > > Chuck Norcutt > > > Ken Norton wrote: >> I'm sorry if I came across a little snippy to Chuck. But let me >> explain my thinking... > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > > -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Two versions of 24/2?, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 20/06/2010: señorita with gin, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Film ain't dead, yet, Bob Whitmire |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Grain, Bokeh, Smokeh [was Film ain't dead, yet], Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |