Subject: | Re: [OM] wahoo! |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 30 May 2010 12:39:50 +0100 |
It might have implied that, but for the "already", which made it vague in time and therefore deserving of perfect(ion). Chris On 30 May 2010, at 11:22, Andrew Fildes wrote: > But each tense here has existential ramifications - > Am I presently deleting what I might or intend to do. Or will I? Or > should I have done it if I were to wish to? > The past implied a time paradox rather nicely I thought. > Andrew Fildes -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 29/5/2010: Botox Whores, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] wahoo!, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] wahoo!, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] wahoo!, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |