Should have added that I was worried - my only decent 52mm UV filter
is a heavy Heliopan that I had on my DZ 50/2 - thought I might have to
buy a slim one. But no vignetting (only just). I think either a slim
Pol or a step up ring and 58mm Pol might be necessary.
And it has a strange and expensive rectangular hood which seems to be
unobtainable outside Japan - LH55B. Any clues on a source?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20/05/2010, at 7:14 AM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Mine arrived yesterday from B&H NY. Come off it, it's almost double
> the length of my 40mm! :-)
> Smaller diameter though. It is extremely compact for what it is.
> Yes it's pricey but maaaate - 18-36mm. What would you have paid for
> that once? What did you pay for an OM 18mm?
> I bought a 4/3rds 40-150mm with type 2 adapter as well because the
> price was amazing - under $200 the set.
> I was going to give it some exercise this weekend but I may have a
> Sony NEX5/16mm to play with instead.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 20/05/2010, at 3:44 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> But Campkins also had a mFT 9-18 and that is a tiny lens! When
>> collapsed it's only slightly longer than my 40/1.7 and quite a bit
>> less in diameter. I really fancy that, but for the price (£649 in
>> Campkins!).
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|