Subject: | Re: [OM] [OT] More fun from Micros*ft |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 15 May 2010 11:31:54 -0400 |
That's simple. The reason is that you're just wrong. Times New Roman is much nicer and easier to read. :-) Chuck Norcutt bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > PS; I never understand why people like Times New Roman so much. > I always use Arial, which is much nicer looking (IMO). -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Value for 38mm f/3.5 macro, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Incident Light Metering, A moment of weakness, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] [OT] More fun from Micros*ft, Paul Braun |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] [OT] More fun from Micros*ft, Chris Barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |