Ken,
This is completely off your OM topic, but related. I think that the E-1 has
the smoothest release experience of any camera I have used since I put away
my screw-mount Leica bodies. Does your experience with the E-1 support
this?
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Incident Light Metering, A moment of weakness
> My question is, who is "Markel"?
>
> I know the OM-4T had this and I suspect the -3T and -2s as well.
>>
>
> The 3Ti has no self-timer. It's mass-dependent for vibration control.
>
> The OM-2S is a slightly different beast than other OM bodies in the
> sequence
> of events when the shutter is fired. It has the greatest lag of all the
> OMs,
> and the vibration caused by the actuator arm occurs farther ahead of the
> exposure.
>
> Personally, I think the OM-1 was the absolute worse at vibration of all
> the
> OM bodies I've had. And this is handheld, not delayed exposure.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|