I think this amount of brain-power (and I'm not belittling it), would get
you the right result with any kind of decent meter. I reckon that's the
point - however you choose to work, you've got to work at it :-)
Tom
On 12 May 2010 19:35, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> I held the incident meter very close to the picture frame,
> right against the wall. With this shot, I wanted the area very
> close to the candle correctly exposed (i.e. not over-exposed),
> with the rest gently falling off. After applying what I thought
> would be sensible time for reciprocity failure on Provia
> (which is excellent in this regards) I exposed exactly as per
> the meter reading, and it came out very well.
> On 12 May 2010, at 1:34 PM, Tom Fenwick wrote:
> >> http://snipurl.com/w5ux5
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> ... no additional brain-power required.
> >>
> >
> > Where did you hold your incident meter?
> >
> > Tom
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|