Subject: | Re: [OM] Demise of the Gs? [was Oly 9-18 vs Panasonic 7-14: any experience out there?] |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 11 May 2010 11:59:10 -0400 |
Thanks for the lesson. I think I've been making it plural my whole life. :-) Chuck Norcutt Chris Barker wrote: > Sorry Ken, but it's time for me to be a bit of a pedant, just for once. > > That should be, "none of them is the X1". Because "none" means "not one". > > Chris > > On 11 May 2010, at 04:58, Ken Norton wrote: > >> Yeah, but none of them are the X1. > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OM) Photographing autumn colours etc (long), Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Demise of the Gs? [was Oly 9-18 vs Panasonic 7-14: any experience out there?], Chris Barker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Demise of the Gs? [was Oly 9-18 vs Panasonic 7-14: any experience out there?], Chris Barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |