Original Messages:
>Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 08:32:03 -0400
>From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>I don't know, it may be a quirk of that lens.
___________________________________
>John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
>Dawid Loubser wrote:
>> So what you could be saying, is that the 250/2.0 is really a 250/1.8 for
>> focusing :-) Wow :-) Or it's really a 250/2.2...
>>
>> But before we start making assumptions, I'd really like somebody in
>> the know to confirm, or somebody with another 250/2.0 to check
>> their lens' behavour.
=====================================================================================
I've been away from this list for a while, but I guess I'm back just in time
for this thread. I checked my 250/2 and
at f/2 the diaphragm is completely open. Pushing the lens button doesn't
change anything unless I set the ring to
a smaller aperture. Hope this helps.
Alan
Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
UPAA POY 1978
University Information Technology Services
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|