I only use one piece of software, Lightroom. It takes care of the entire
workflow from RAW conversion to web display or print. Of course, one must have
a reasonably modern computer. LR runs fine on my 2005 vintage Powerbook G4,
although it runs a lot better on my iMac from last year or my MacBook Pro from
this year.
For me, shooting JPEGs is simply a waste of space.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On May 7, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> Nathan
>
> I agree with you, but I should imagine that it's hassle if you have limited
> storage space and limited processing power. And that's without considering
> the plethora of conversion systems available. I think that all 3 factors
> militate against Brian's using RAW.
>
> Some of our number output RAW and Jpeg with each shot. For me that would be
> too much hassle ...
>
> Chris
>
> On 7 May 2010, at 06:36, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>> Brian, dealing with RAW files is not "hassle". It is an indispensable part
>> of digital photography if you care about image quality.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|