Hmmm, you might be right, Chuck. It was a long way off, but it might have been
parallax for at least part of it.
I'll check again.
Thanks
Chris
On 2 May 2010, at 21:12, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Are you sure you're not just dealing with parallax error? Sounds like
> you were up close and personal with those bluebells and I doubt that any
> auxiliary optical finder to fit the hot shoe is going to suit for macro
> photography or near macro. Have you maybe forgotten what it was like to
> use a rangefinder up close? Remember the parallax correction marks for
> near focus where "near" was probably defined as about a meter.
>
> A 25mm finder is going to have an easier job of pointing the camera up
> close than something designed for a longer focal length.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|