I haven't use the 100/2 enough to say how it performs in various situations,
on the field I found it is harder to confirm focus than 90/2 and 180/2.8 but
when carefully tested, 100/2 has slightly better center resolution than 90/2
(while 90/2 has much better edge to edge performance). Here is a sample from
100/2 at F2.8 (sorry for the shallow DOF):
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2061.JPG (~3.5MB)
Here what really amazing could be the model :-)
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicholas Herndon"
>
> As for the OMZ 100/2, I'm okay with paying the "spousal tax" (ha!).
> I've heard so many great things about this lens, and seen so many
> amazing photos taken with it (I'm looking at you CH) that I figure
> it's worth the hassle of putting some of my other OMZs back into
> circulation.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
