Subject: | Re: [OM] 90/2, zoom vs. prime and stuff [was Dude, who cares about .56ms?] |
---|---|
From: | NSURIT@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:54:33 EDT |
In a message dated 4/15/2010 8:50:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time, jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx writes: Virtually all of the flower photos in the following link are E-1 (not E-3) and 90/2. _http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/IRNP/album/Tobin%20Harbor/index.html_ (http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/IRNP/album/Tobin%20Harbor/index.html) Who is that good looking guy in the front of the canoe? <{B^) Bill Barber -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 15/4/2010: a delightful couple, Nathan Wajsman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: walkabout in Valencia, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 15/4/2010: a delightful couple, Nathan Wajsman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2, zoom vs. prime and stuff [was Dude, who cares about .56ms?], Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |