> Obviously, the microlenses are different, and that does put a bullet in the
> Oly theory about tne necessity of telecentric lenses. Also, there may or
> may
> not be differences in the Bayer filters.
>
Actually, Olympus was correct. But the reality is, for the FourThirds bodies
(not Micro FourThirds), the angle of incidence never gets severe enough to
be a problem. I have found that with the E-1 and it's hyper-aggressive AA
filter, that a lens with a very rear-nodal point a long ways from the
sensor, the image sharpness actually improves. I also get more
dust-bunnies, but that's another story too.
The Bayer filter is different--just barely different, but it is. I could
give a big explanation, but I'll pass right now.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|