Subject: | Re: [OM] Complaint about thread hijacking, was: Compliant about thread hijacking |
---|---|
From: | "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:08:49 -0000 |
And thank you for wielding the snips, Michael. Piers -----Original Message----- From: Michael Collins [mailto:MRC.OlympusList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 23 March 2010 20:47 To: Olympus Camera Discussion Subject: [OM] Complaint about thread hijacking, was: Compliant about thread hijacking On 3/23/10 4:25 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > Seems you forgot to change the subject. I changed it for you. :-) His complaint was that it was non-compliant... but at least he was not complacent. Michael -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] The 7-14's take on Rugby, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 22/3/2010: Leica at the Chandos, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Complaint about thread hijacking, was: Compliant about thread hijacking, Michael Collins |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: back to the mundane, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |