Yes, I do like it a lot. I have another 35mm, the Summicron, for shooting in
low light the 1.2 cannot be beat. However, I agree that it does not make a lot
of sense to have both this and the 1.4/40.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Mar 12, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Carlos J. Santisteban wrote:
>
>
>> 35mm f/1.2,
>
> Too close to the 40/1.4 for mw to justify... but Nathan seems to like it a
> lot.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|