Perhaps I was unclear. I was not presuming to state your lens
characteristic preferences, perhaps with the exception of silver nosed
Zuikos, :-)
but that you comprehensively reponded to a list member's inquiry about
8 mos ago regarding the dof differences between FF and FT
at the same aperture.
Nonetheless, "I couldn't give a rip how narrow the DoF is."---those be
fightin' words for the selective focus affectionados. ;-)
Mike
> Yes, the 20mm f1.7 is a nice one indeed but the selective focus crowd
> would like a stop or more faster for more flexible dof control.
> DOF equivalence is about F 3.4 on FF. Not as impressive when viewed
> from that perspective. Dr. Focus and AG have calculated the exact
> dof difference, but 2 stops is close enough for gov't work.
>
Nah, I couldn't give a rip how narrow the DoF is. I'm more interested
in how
the bokeh looks. Even the lowly 50mm F3.5 macro lens does a great job in
that department.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|