Subject: | Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!! |
---|---|
From: | "Bob Docherty" <lostkase@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:06:44 -0500 |
Silly man, That's not even close to enough. You've got to have multiple copies of each body. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:28 PM Subject: Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!! > >>> Good thing I didn't buy either one. Guess I kept all my OM lenses in >>> vain? >> >> >> Not if you also kept one of those nifty OM bodies to mount the OM lenses. >> >> AG > Well, let's see- an OM1-n, an OM2s and an OM4ti. Is that enough? > > Billl Pearce > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Oly announcement soon--something new?, usher99 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Ubiquitous Ken, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Chuck is back, was: Chuck will be gone for a week, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |