I prefer the one with the shadows, 2010-PAW-04-Mutz-1150380-3.
I downloaded both full size 1200x907/908 shots. What did you do, crop
them so they matched almost exactly? When you flip back and forth
between them they look to be identical images except for the shadows on
the slope behind the tree. To do that with 2 bodies, I'd have to have a
solid bench rest :-)
Or are you testing us ? :-)
--
Russ Butler (NJ USA)
philippe.amard wrote:
> I shot these this afternoon; neither interesting nor artistic as such,
> but I used two bodies on a same lens, and didn't fiddle much with the
> files so I'd like to know your 'perception' of the rendition of either.
>
> Note that the light had changed ... cloudy background , then sunny,
> hence some WB issues, and or colour rendition?
> Other?
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2010/2010-PAW-04-Mutz-1310602.jpg.html
>
> Exif is available
>
> Thanks in anticipation
> Philippe
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
