Yes, it seems to have more resolution.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:29 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> In what way is the EVF on the EP-2 better than the GF-1? More
> resolution, brighter, contrastier, or ... ??
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> If you want small and high quality, think micro 4/3, guys. I love the GF-1.
>> Its image quality is SUPERIOR to my E3. A co-worker of mine received his new
>> EP-2 today, also really neat, and the EVF is better than mine.
>>
>> I think both Panasonic and Olympus have real winners on their hands here.
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>
>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Daniel Sepke wrote:
>>
>>> I didn't and wouldn't say I am 100% happy with the situation. Sure I wish we
>>> had an OM sized DSLR with a 35mm sized sensor but let's be realistic it's
>>> not going to happen anytime soon. Perhaps it would be better articulated as
>>> that for certain lens and body combinations there is an ergonomic advantage
>>> to a minimum size. Even if I switch brands this type of lens (70-200mm
>>> f2.8+) isn't going to get much smaller or lighter. Personally I have
>>> accepted the physical situation in trade for the end results. Now granted I
>>> don't shoot this lens at f2 (all the time) and if they made a 35-100 f2.8
>>> that was sharp at f2.8 I would definitely buy that lens. What I really wish
>>> existed for the E System was a 24-70mm (equiv to FL to 50-140) f2.8. A lens
>>> in that range would cover the near portrait range through portrait range
>>> without needing a lot of innovation in design.
>>>
>>> Dan S.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: C.H.Ling
>>> Subject: Re: [OM] Musings from the dark side - i.e. life with 5D2
>>>
>>> In the old days we appreciated the small OM system and Olympus claimed the
>>> 4/3 is smaller, lighter and cheaper so we have to compromise for a small
>>> sensor and higher noise.... but nothing came true. Then now we are happy
>>> with the big lenses and bodies ?????
>>>
>>> C.H.Ling
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Daniel Sepke"
>>>
>>>> Ken has a very good point here. In the E System the 35-100mm and the E-3
>>>> are made for each other, the balance is great.<snip>
>>>> Dan S.
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|