Hi Chris,
My Sunday bag is much lighter, The body with the hefty 35-80 feels and
handles similar to the E-3 with 12-60 however whereas before I carried
the 7-14 and 70-300 plus OM 90/2 along the the 3ti and 21/2 I now only
need to carry the OM glass and I have added a 500/8 for distance and a
few more in between but OM glass is much smaller and lighter ;-).
They have a 420 dual lens kit for 600Sfr in my local camera shop, I was
tempted for a while but the E-3 still has some redeeming features which
make up for its bulk.
I also am having problems with my elbow and thumb, but now Cai can walk
more there is room inthe pram for my rucksack ;-)
On 25/01/2010 11:54, Chris Barker wrote:
> Thanks, Ian.
>
> You didn't mention size or portability; I have always assumed that the 5D...
> would be heavier to carry and therefore less likely to be in my bag.
>
> I have to say that I sometimes miss the compactness (relative, of course) of
> the E-1. But I have my E-420 (for Four Thirds lenses) and GF-1 (fixed focal
> length and manual Zuikos) for portability. On that subject, I have developed
> supraspinatus tendonitis to add to my epicondylitis (tennis/golfer's elbow)
> so am forbidden from carrying heavy bags at the moment.
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|