I read it, Chuck. Since you ask again, this is my set of thoughts:
It's a simplistic article. It is written to get attention with the acronym and
then goes through a set of trite arguments. The author doesn't seem to know
about Four Thirds DSLRs. The style and tone is typical of the mandatory
"humorous" article that seems to crop up in what passes for news programmes on
US TV (and which is more common in the UK, unfortunately).
The cameras are really only slightly smaller than something like the E-420
unless you stick to the pancake lens; and chappie the author doesn't mention
that the zooms are too big to put in the pocket, or that the Canyon G11 might
be a contender, because it doesn't fit with his story.
That's what I think. Yes, it is still early in the morning here, what of it
... ? :-)
Chris
On 20 Jan 2010, at 16:52, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> What? No comments at all on EVIL cameras?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> EVIL = Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens
>> <http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/five-reasons-you-should-ditch-your-dslr/>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|