Martyn Smoothy wrote:
> Like them both but prefer 18.
> Thought this might work in B&W so did a conversion (hope you don't mind, but
> if you do just say & I'll remove it)
> - http://archaeoimages.com/tmp/temp_files.html
>
I'm not sure what you intended with this conversion. It's gone from very
smooth and soft to grainy and edgy. Like a different intent in mood -
the fog of the title is mostly gone. Not necessarily wrong, but it seems
much more than a simple conversion to B&W.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Mike/foggytree0518.htm>
I think it works as a simple conversion with the same mood as the
original, but personally prefer the very low key color version.
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|