Subject: | Re: [OM] foggy trees |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:16:34 -0800 |
Mike Lazzari wrote: > A couple of the same tree. Taken Saturday with the E620 + 12-60 @21mm, > @12mm f5 > Which do you prefer ... if either. Comments welcome. > > http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Jan10/foggytree0517.jpg > http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Jan10/foggytree0518.jpg > 518 does it for me; more attention on the main subject and a bit foggier looking. Whatayagonnado when given fog? Make foggy images! <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Maine/Inside%20Maine%20Clouds&image=20DSCF0576cr.jpg> Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] foggy trees, Jim Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Digital equipment for bird photography, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] foggy trees, Jim Nichols |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] foggy trees, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |