That's great on both counts, John: that your wife sees you with new eyes, and
that your son is being trusted.
Good luck with the 90-250 ...
Chris
On 8 Jan 2010, at 02:55, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> My understanding is that the original lens is the better of the two. I
> have one but don't use it much as I also have a 50-200. I recently
> purchased a E-30 that had the 14-42 with it. I am parting with my E-500
> the 14-42 and a new 70-300 that I got for a good price for from Adorama to
> my youngest son for his 15th birthday as he showing signs of wanting a
> better camera then what he has now a Kodak dx6490 another hand me down.
> This is the first time in my life that I have ever given up any of my
> Olympus equipment and my with is quite astonished and was speechless for
> several minutes when I told her. It did take some convincing to get her to
> believe that the 70-300 was for him and not me until I showed her what I
> really wanted and that was the 90-250 and that this was for him. I cannot
> wait to see his face when I give it to him along with the new lens. He
> thinks that I don't trust him because I have not let him use it. John
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|