----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Wilcox"
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:37 PM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Your images look pretty good on my EIZO L568. I just curious if the
>> calibration works, I can't get the exact gammas and not able to see the
>> darkest three squares and brightest one (254) on
>> http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/. Anyway, it is good to know it works so
>> well.
>>
>> BTW, is your monitor able to resolve upper and lower part of row 1? (part
>> or
>> all?)
>>
>> http://www.drycreekphoto.com/Learn/Calibration/monitor_sensitivity.html
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>
>>From 143 down to 15 is discernible, but very faintly.
>
> On the lagom site, there is not as much differentiation between the
> two darkest squares as I wish, but the monitor does better than any
> other I have looked at (which is not saying too much however).
>
> Joel W.
Wow, that's really good considering the cost. I'm also considering an
upgrade but the high end LCDs are still very expensive, the cheaper one just
don't bring much benefit.
C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|