Thanks, Joel, you answered all of my questions, even the ones I forgot
to ask. :-)
Candace
Joel Wilcox wrote:
Hi Candace,
According to the EXIF it was 283mm, so the lens was racked out. No
special prowess involved, just a lucky location and absolute
dependence upon the AF. I had the camera on a tripod, but loose so
that I had the ability to pan up and down and sideways. The TC slows
down AF a mite, and the 50-200 is the older one, though it focuses
much faster and more accurately with the E-3 than with any of my other
bodies. I kept IS on -- maybe I shouldn't have -- though it would not
have been a factor since I used ISO 800 to get an appropriate shutter
speed for the subject.
Thanks for your comments.
Joel
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|