I'm afraid that didn't make any sense to me at all. But, even if true,
I suspect that it's probably essentially meaningless relative to the
loss of dynamic range after conversion to an 8 bit CMYK space for printing.
Chuck Norcutt
Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Well, I hadn't followed this thread so far - should start from its
> beginning ....
>
> But this statement is a showstopper for me.
> Does it imply that we are _always_ dealing with a finite number of bits?
>
> If yes, why so? [theoretically speaking that is].
>
> Mercy please, I'm only asking as an ignorant being .... as Meno's
> slave boy ... :-)
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato%27s_Problem#Socratic_method>
>
> Fernando.
>
> 2009/12/9 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
>> . Even
>> less if you convert to aRGB as the dynamic range is sacrificed in exchange
>> for a wider color gamut.
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|