There is magenta shift at the shadow even without push:
Here is the normal exposed one:
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_7213.CR2
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt"
>A 4 stops higher ISO would have produced a correct exposure. But he was
> deliberately underexposing to test shadow recovery. DPP clearly works
> better than ACR in this case (at least for the 5DMkII). But my point
> (and I think Moose's as well) is that I don't (normally) care because I
> wouldn't think of even trying to recover shadow detail that was 4 stops
> underexposed.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> SwissPace wrote:
>> Yesterday I was going to suggest that maybe trying a higher ISO (as they
>> are so detailed and clean) instead of using low iso settings, unless you
>> particularly need low ISO because it is so bright but as we are dealing
>> with shadows I am guessing this is not an issue, but then I read it
>> affects all iso settings, although experimentation might find a sweet
>> spot.
>>
>> On 03/12/2009 13:56, C.H.Ling wrote:
>>> As I have mentioned different people has different acceptance standard
>>> and
>>> it related to how they use their camera. BTW, I don't see any problem in
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|