And Nathan and I use the LX3. I am very happy with mine: in particular the
wide (24mm), the variable format (3:2, 4:3 or 16:9), and the results are very
good. And it is small enough to fit easily into a jacket pocket: a delightful
little device all round
My only whinge is that Mac users (iPhoto or Aperture) can't use RAW direct.
But you get SilkyPix with the LX3 to interpret the RAW files and ACR works
anyway for Photoshop and LightRoom. In addition, Picasa and LightZone on the
Mac do a great job with the RAW files.
I am tempted to get the G11 as well, but it would be a large expenditure (in
the UK) and I would have to sell my E-420, with which I am very happy.
Chris
On 1 Dec 2009, at 03:44, Moose wrote:
> If you are really looking for a replacement for a Stylus and the IQ of
> film, your budget is more flexible, and a really long zoom range isn't
> necessary, you might also consider moving to a camera with a bigger
> sensor. That tends to be where the rubber meets the road in IQ. Two very
> different cameras with the next size up sensors are the Panny LX3 and
> Canon G11.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|