I really have no cure on the lighting, looking at a video I took with the 5D
II (a different time again :-)), I can't detect any change of the background
lighting slightly before and after the shot. I don't have any E-thing now so
can't make a comparison test but I did a test with 5D II at ISO1600 from
normal to -4 stops, the colors look ok even for the darkest one, seems not
bad.
Here are the samples from normal to -4 stops, direct JPEG from camera (~2MB
each):
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_7238.JPG
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_7239.JPG
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_7240.JPG
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_7241.JPG
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_7242.JPG
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "SwissPace"
> Maybe the lighting just changed as part of the show, they must have been
> taken at slightly different times, some of the characters in the 520
> picture are lit from both sides whilst in the 5D they are lit just from
> the right so maybe the background lights where just coming up as well so
> I am with chuck on this one.
>> I just think a more precisely controlled lighting test is in order
>> before declaring the 5DII a dummy at reproducing shadows. But it could
>> be.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>>> The lighting between the two scenes absolutely is different. One
>>> possible
>>> reason is that the lighting in the E-520 shot is higher because they may
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
