Hmmmmmm
This is going to read as if I'm just a grumpy old git, but why the question,
Philippe?
You know which is the better one, and anyway, a PAW is supposed to be your
choice of photos to display to your admirers, n'est-ce pas? So presenting a
choice to your viewers (your faithful viewers, no less) seems to defeat the
point of a PAW.
Of course, I might have this PAW stuff all wrong; or this might be me in
unnecessarily critical or picky mode, but the idea is that you put up your
photo and invite C and C, as you normally put it.
Non? :-)
Chris
On 18 Nov 2009, at 18:50, Philippe Amard wrote:
> PAW 46 is up, but I'm still wondering if the crop
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/2009-PAW-46-Triangulation-1140498.jpg.html
>
> is any better than the original shot.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/2009-PAW-46-Triangulation-1140498-2.jpg.html
>
> Thanks in anticipation for on or off-list input or feedback
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
