On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Jim Couch
<zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am beginning to think I am a bit crazy! for those who are interested I
> have posted a set of photos on my smugmug page: E620 raw WB comparison
> <http://www.unicornphotography.com/Other/E620-test/10343459_o9XAP#715479280_uUNxp>
>
> I would love to hear other's comments.
Jim,
The jpg and Studio are a pretty good match, but I'm surprised they are
not a perfect match if you didn't change any of the camera settings
either in the camera or in conversion. Maybe it's a 620 vagary.
OK I'll go out on a limb.
This set demonstrates one of the things that I have noted about the
non-Olympus converters and Studio. I'm really sensitive to the color
of the sky. Studio is better here (and quite other) than all the
other converters to my eyes. But I'm puzzled why it doesn't match the
jpg a little better than it does, and I actually prefer it to the jpg.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|