OK, good point. I think I'll buy that. There has to be at least one
pixel representing the wire in order to be preserved for the downsizing.
Chuck Norcutt
Donald wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Sorry, Donald, but people gushing over the sharpness of web images is
>> one of the things that grates me. Good contrast and color rendition,
>> yes. Sharpness? No way. The information has been thrown away in the
>> resizing to a tiny image.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>
> :-)
>
> Shutting up didn't last long, did it?
>
> I was taking my cue from the aerial that the bird is sitting on; you can
> count the wires in that thing. To me, and YMMD, you need sharp to get
> that detail, that good.
>
> So there. Nyah. IMHO. Etc.
>
> :-)
>
> D.
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|