Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> small
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/4107457202/>
> large
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/4107457202/sizes/o/>
>
> handheld Olympus OM 2n on Auto mode, Zuiko 200mm ƒ/4 @ ƒ/8 - Ektachorme
> 100 - sRGB
>
> link to view on black.
>
> enjoy
>
> :-)
>
> Fernando.
>
Fernando,
Your David a Firenze [1991] image is beautiful and well worth the
trouble you went through to capture it.
The sky looks much too violet to me in firefox 3.5.4 when I have color
management enabled. I don't know if that was your intent. If it was
please ignore what follows.
The sky in Moose's adjustments
http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/FGonzalezG/David.htm
looks less violet/more blue i.e. more natural to me.
When I view the image without color management, the sky also looks more
natural.
I was curious as to what profile was embedded in the jpeg, but as I
don't use PS, and my other programs (raw therapee, photoline, ..), while
rendering the sky violet when using the embedded profile, do not report
the name/spec of the profile. So I looked at the jpeg in hex and found:
ICCProfile="sRGB IEC61966-2.1
&
Intent: relative colorimetric
From that I'd conclude that what I see on my (uncalibrated but fairly
close) monitor is what you intended. But since all this color management
and profile stuff is confusing, I'm not confident in my conclusion :-)
On a separate note, I was surprised to find all your editing steps had
been embedded by CS3 into the jpeg. You may not have intended to include
the editing details.
About 40K bytes worth of stuff like:
"
Magic Wand
Set Selection	To: 2201 pixels, 5274 pixels

"
Looks like a lot of dust/dirt removal going on. BTDT on scans and know
the pain :-)
--
Russ Butler (NJ USA)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|