I recall the same terminology in use here in the USA, Chris. Unfortunately
also gone as you note. Seems to me that the trend--in far too many
things--is to bland homogeneity.
---
Scott Gomez
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As well as my interest in the photograph, the name "Angels one" intrigued
> me. It was the term used in the early days of the RAF to denote an
> aircraft's altitude, in this case 1,000ft.
>
> Chris
> [who's a bit peeved that all the traditional RAF radio terminology is being
> changed to that used by the civilians, or US military, or both]
>
> On 12 Nov 2009, at 21:18, Philippe Amard wrote:
>
> >
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Angels/Engelberg-Angels--1130846.jpg.html
> > (Can be seen larger-gear available in the exif)
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
