I bet it's smaller than the 35-100 :-)
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:20 AM, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I Know the 250/2 is MUCH bigger but here is what the 180/2 look like
> with an OM body, yep I know I have posted this before but that lens
> cost me a fortune (though much less than its the 18,000 Swiss franc list
> price) and I need to get some value from it ;-)
>
> <http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/LATEST-NEWS/LATEST-NEWS-2009-17th-August/7009141_k2AJN#448729951_eTFZ2-A-LB>
>
> IanW
>
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|