>
> > Unfortunately, my opinion of E camera usability (derived solely from
> > reading Oly manuals) doesn't support your hypothesis.
>
> I agree Chuck, the real reason is that us E users are so much smarter than
> n*k*n/c*n*n users we don't need those books !
>
The sole exception to this would be the E-1. It was simple enough (lacked
enough features, inotherwords) that you could figure it out for the most
part without too much of a sweat.
I think the E-3's implemention of menus and basic file settings is among the
worse designs I've ever seen. It is so bad that the intuitive stuff is
unintuitive. It's a fine camera in most every other way, though. The
E-P1's menu system takes unintuitiveness to another fine level.
AG (aperture, speed, focus) Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|