Subject: | Re: [OM] The Curse of the Lost Lens Cap |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:19:30 -0600 |
I'm with Ken Rockwell on this. His opinion is that only amateur systems have multiple filter-ring sizes. For many years nearly every lens I had was strictly 49mm in filter-ring size. Nowadays I have filters in three sizes AND I carry no less than four step rings. AG (is KR my alter ego?) Schnozz -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Lightroom?, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Lightroom?, Philippe Amard |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] The Curse of the Lost Lens Cap, iwert bernakiewicz |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] The Curse of the Lost Lens Cap, Sue Pearce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |