Fine, so long as you have real choices. These are often distractions.
Think of cars - they'll cheerfully offer you a choice of colour but
real choices?
They'll make what they can make, cheaply, and then persuade you to buy
it.
People might demand the right to buy a shirt made in the US, or UK or
Aus. - until they discover that the Chinese one is a quarter of the
price.
Then their principles tend to vapourise.
Generally our choices are rather tightly controlled by limiting the
offers and other, more subtle mechanisms.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 03/11/2009, at 8:23 PM, SwissPace wrote:
> My problem with this stuff is whether or not it's a "faddish
> annoyance"
> to some, I want them and me to be able to choose to eat such foods or
> not, (same as I want to be able to avoid wifi) whether or not you
> agree
> or disagree about the food shouldn't matter, wars were fought for the
> freedom of choice for men and woman, and I want this choice!. This
> freedom however goes against any governing bodies ideas and thus is
> continually being eroded.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|