Subject: | Re: [OM] (OM) once again, digital vs film |
---|---|
From: | Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:28:50 +0200 |
Thanks for the info - 4.5 s good enough for me at this stage then! It takes an extreme image needing more, I think. I will definitely revisit below-the-lens filters sometime. On 28 Sep 2009, at 4:58 PM, Ken Norton wrote: > > That particular head will max out at about Grade 4.5. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-620 is here - first impressions., Jim Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Traveling OM1, Dawid Loubser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OM) once again, digital vs film, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OM) once again, digital vs film, Clay Nichols |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |