In my monitor I see the subtle graduation in the original image, I think Jim
expected the larger image is more clearly shown.
It might be a monitor problem, sometimes a simple calibration won't help. It
is whether your monitor can resolve each adjacence step (i.e. differ between
200 and 201, 201 and 202....)
Your adjusted image doesn't look good on my monitor, the graduation is not
smooth.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose"
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Hi Moose,
>>
>> I should have pointed out that, in the LUG gallery, where this image
>> resides, one must often click on the "double square" symbol at the top or
>> bottom in order to see the image as it was uploaded. That improves the
>> detail if the shot was not sized to come up initially in full size.
>>
>
> I wasn't referring to sharpness detail. When I refer to "tonal detail",
> I am talking about the amount and distribution of brightness differences.
>
> In this case, if you look at before and after, you will see that some
> subtle graduation of highlights has replaced apparently pure white on
> wings and body. Not much change, but it gives more sense of the body and
> wing shapes.
>
> Moose
> --
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|