Subject: | Re: [OM] Sagitarius enhanced? [was The rule of 600, was: LV vs. EV and low light metering] |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:15:39 -0700 |
Ralf Loi wrote: > > Moose, > your elaboration is very effective, and goes in the right way. In general, > every astropic has to be enhanced in some way, particularly if it is a > digitized film based photo. > My humble selection is on (already posted here): > http://outdoors.webshots.com/album/453120252zQWYwx > Thanks. I'm no judge of astropics, but I enjoyed yours. Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Test, please ignore, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Prolific stereo photographers, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sagitarius enhanced? [was The rule of 600, was: LV vs. EV and low light metering], Ralf Loi |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sagitarius enhanced? [was The rule of 600, was: LV vs. EV and low light metering], Ralf Loi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |