| Subject: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) substitute for Sigma 14mm rectilinial (spelling?) |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:50:41 -0400 |
I don't think I'd have agreed to the 90 to 110 switch. Chuck Norcutt Brian Swale wrote: > > Look at the image (borrowed from a file of a well-known manufacturer) at the > top link of > http://www.brianswale.com/zuikoholics/index.htm > and compare 110 with 90mm. > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Guru or Flack? [was Another sunset sky from Colorado], Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Question: Early OM-1?, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) substitute for Sigma 14mm rectilinial (spelling?), Brian Swale |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Question: Early OM-1?, DrT (George Themelis) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |