Anybody with an FL-50 got a meter? How accurate are the guide numbers
at various power levels and zoom settings?
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> Sorry for mis-read your point, the GNs on older flashes might be not
> accurate and mostly under powered but the FL50 seems much better. On the
> field it is not easy to reach a very accurate fill due to time limit,
> sometimes I just use TTL with -1 flash compensation. I'm also not good in
> estimate distance but anything in the 0.5 stop error range is ok with me.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt"
>
>> How does any of this relate to the subject of my comment which was that
>> flash units tend to be underpowered with respect to guide number? My
>> statement means if you use guide number in your calculation your shot
>> will be slightly underexposed. That's all. I meant nothing with
>> respect to various exposure situations.
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|